Search Ranking
SEOClassic organic results on Google and Bing.
Moderate
Active (moderate). The page is indexable and quality and authority are strong enough to rank.
Your robots.txt now has separate switches for search engines, AI search and AI training. Move seven signals and see exactly which of four visibility layers each one controls.
An illustrative model built from platform documentation, not a measurement of any real site. Last verified 11 October 2026. Check your real page free →
Active layers
4 of 4
Visibility
Full Stack Visibility
All four layers active
Depth and accuracy, original data, cited sources and freshness. Research on generative engines links statistics, citations and quotations to higher visibility.
Backlinks, third-party mentions and recognised expertise.
One canonical brand name and matching structured data everywhere. Adds lift, never a hard requirement.
Answer-first structure, clear headings and passages that can be quoted on their own.
Googlebot and Bingbot can crawl and index the page, and it is eligible for snippets (no noindex or nosnippet).
OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot and Claude-SearchBot, which build the indexes behind ChatGPT search, Perplexity and Claude search.
GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, used to collect data for training future models.
Classic organic results on Google and Bing.
Moderate
Active (moderate). The page is indexable and quality and authority are strong enough to rank.
Featured snippets, AI Overviews, AI Mode and Copilot answers, all fed by the search index.
Moderate
Active (moderate). The page is indexable and its answers are clean enough to be extracted.
Cited in ChatGPT search, Perplexity and Claude search, which run their own crawlers.
Strong
Active (strong). AI search crawlers can read the page, and clean formatting makes it quotable.
Your brand present in what language models learned in training.
Moderate
Active (moderate). Quality and authority give your brand lasting presence in model training data, and training crawlers can collect new content.
SEO, AEO, GEO and LLMO overlap heavily, and many practitioners treat them as one discipline with different emphasis. They are separated here because each one has different technical gates, which is what the simulator shows. Google's own guidance is that no special optimisation is required for its AI features: strong fundamentals apply.
Each layer has hard requirements that switch it on or off, and lift factors that only change how strong it is. This list is generated from the same code that drives the simulator.
Checked against the vendors' own documentation on 11 October 2026. Crawler policies change, so confirm against the current pages before editing robots.txt.
It shows which of four visibility layers switch on for a given combination of seven signals: content quality, brand authority, entity consistency, clean formatting, search-engine indexing, AI search crawler access and AI training crawler access. The layers are search ranking (SEO), answer features (AEO), AI search citation (GEO) and model memory (LLMO). Each layer has stated hard requirements, and the page tells you exactly which one is missing when a layer is off.
No. OpenAI documents GPTBot (model training), OAI-SearchBot (ChatGPT search) and ChatGPT-User (user-initiated actions) as independent settings. Blocking GPTBot keeps your content out of future model training but does not remove you from ChatGPT search. Blocking OAI-SearchBot does. Anthropic splits ClaudeBot (training) from Claude-SearchBot (search) the same way, and Perplexity says PerplexityBot builds its search index and is not used for training.
Google says no. Its guidance states that a page needs to be indexed and eligible to appear in Search with a snippet, and that there are no additional requirements, special optimisations or special structured data for AI Overviews and AI Mode. Google-Extended does not affect Search inclusion or ranking. In this model those features sit in the answer-features layer and depend on search indexing, not on AI crawler settings.
Not reliably. These fetchers act when a person asks the assistant to open a page, and the vendors note that robots.txt rules may not apply to user-initiated requests. Perplexity states that Perplexity-User generally ignores robots.txt. The simulator therefore models the automatic search and training crawlers, which do honour it.
No. It is an illustrative model of the Citation Architecture built from platform documentation and published research, not a measurement of any real website. It makes the dependencies visible so you can see which fix unlocks which layer. Content signals such as evidence, citations and clarity are lift factors in the model, and the research behind them (for example the Princeton GEO study) reports effects that vary by domain. To check a real page, run the free AI Visibility Check and test your queries in the answer engines directly.
In this model SEO is classic search ranking, AEO is answer placement in search features such as featured snippets, AI Overviews and Copilot answers, GEO is citation by AI search engines that run their own crawlers, and LLMO is presence in what language models learned in training. The terms overlap heavily and many practitioners treat them as one discipline with different emphasis. They are separated here because each has different technical gates, and those gates are what the simulator makes visible.
The simulator shows how the layers depend on each other. The free check scores your actual page for entity clarity, content depth and citation readiness.
Questions? contact@ideapreneur.io