Get an instant snapshot of your AI citation readiness in 3 minutes. No email required.
Enter your full URL to see your scores
Analyzing your domain…
Instant results • No signup required
One email only. No subscribe. No follow-up unless you reply.
You’re creating content. Your competitors are getting cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. You’re not. The problem isn’t your content quality — it’s your signal architecture.
This free check scans three critical indicators to tell you where you stand and what’s blocking you.
Can AI systems reliably attribute your content to your organization?
Is your content substantial enough for AI retrieval and extraction?
Are your articles formatted for AI extraction?
This check shows 3 aggregated signals. The Authority Audit maps all 8 — with competitor benchmarks, a 90-day roadmap, and a walkthrough call.
Get the Full Audit →$199 • 7-day delivery • Full refund if not satisfied
This quick check gives you a surface-level snapshot. It doesn’t tell you:
For the complete diagnostic, you need the Authority Audit.
Best for: Quick initial assessment to see if you have major problems.
Best for: Building a complete AI visibility strategy with an actionable execution plan.
Get Full Audit →Checks for Organization schema on your homepage, Wikidata entity registration, and consistent entity references across your site.
Why it matters: Without entity clarity, AI systems can’t reliably attribute your content to your brand. You become “anonymous content” even if you rank on Google.
Checks average word count across published articles, percentage meeting the 2,500+ word threshold, and comprehensiveness indicators.
Why it matters: Longer, more comprehensive content tends to be better represented in AI training and retrieval — both because it provides more extractable signal and because length correlates with the depth that training curation tends to favor. The 1,500-word threshold is a practical heuristic, not a documented training cutoff.
Checks for direct extractable answer statements, clear claim attribution, and citation-friendly formats (lists, FAQs, summaries).
Why it matters: Even if your content is retrieved, AI systems need to parse it confidently. Ambiguous writing means they cite someone else.
This free check is directionally useful but tactically incomplete. You know you have problems. You don’t know exactly what they are or how to fix them in the right sequence. That’s what the $199 Authority Audit is for.
Yes. No email required, no credit card, no trial period. Run the check, see your scores, done. We use it as a qualification tool — if your scores indicate major problems, you’re a good fit for the paid Authority Audit.
Directionally accurate but incomplete. The free check scans 3 aggregated indicators. The paid Authority Audit scans 8 granular signals with full technical analysis. Think of this as a blood pressure check vs. a full physical exam.
Maybe not immediately. Good scores (7-8+) mean your foundation is solid. But you might have specific technical blockers that don’t show up in the free check. If you’re publishing regularly but still not seeing citations, the paid audit tells you why.
Yes. Enter any domain. It’s a public-facing diagnostic.
Depends on which blocker is flagged. Entity creation (Wikidata): 2–3 hours. Content depth issues: 1–2 weeks per article rewrite. Citation readiness formatting: 30–60 minutes per article. The paid audit gives exact time estimates for every fix.
The free check told you there’s a problem. The Authority Audit tells you exactly what it is, why it’s happening, and how to fix it — with a prioritized 90-day roadmap and step-by-step implementation guide.
Get Full Audit →$199 • 7-day delivery • Full refund if not satisfied